Sign in with Facebook
  • Facebook Page: 128172154133
  • Twitter: EarthProtect1

Posted by on in Wildlife Conservation
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 193
  • 0 Comments

Biden delays Trump rule that weakened wild bird protections

By Matthew Brown The Associated Press

BILLINGS, MONT. » The Biden administration said Thursday it was delaying a rule finalized in former President Donald Trump’s last days in office that drastically would have weakened the government’s power to enforce a century-old law protecting most wild birds.

U.S. wildlife officials have said the rule could mean more birds die, including those that land in oil pits or collide with power lines or other structures. But under Trump, the Interior Department sided with industry groups that had long sought to end criminal prosecutions of accidental but preventable bird deaths.

While the new rule had been set to go into effect on Monday, The Associated Press obtained details of the delay before an expected announcement. Interior Department officials said they were putting off the rule at President Joe Biden’s direction and will reopen the issue to public comment.

The migratory bird rule was among dozens of Trump-era policies affecting the environment that Biden ordered to be reconsidered on his first day in office.

Former federal officials, attorneys for conservation groups and Democrats in Congress have said many of the Trump rules were targeted at benefiting private industry at the expense of conservation.

“The Migratory Bird Treaty Act is a bedrock environmental law critical to protecting migratory birds and restoring declining bird populations,” Interior spokeswoman Melissa Schwartz said. “The Trump administration sought to overturn decades of bipartisan and international precedent in order to protect corporate polluters.”

A federal judge in August had blocked a prior attempt by the Trump administration to change how the 1918 bird treaty was enforced. But the administration remained adamant that the law had been wielded inappropriately for decades to penalize companies and other entities that kill birds accidentally.

The highest-profile enforcement case bought under the law resulted in a $100 million settlement by energy company BP after the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill killed about 100,000 birds.

More than 1,000 North American species are covered by the law — from the fast-flying peregrine falcon to numerous tiny songbirds and more than 20 species of owls. Non-native species and some game birds such as turkeys are not on the list.

In 2017, the government stopped enforcing the law against companies and other entities in accidental bird deaths.

The move to lessen enforcement standards drew a sharp backlash from organizations that advocate on behalf of an estimated 46 million U.S. birdwatchers. It came at a time when species across North America were in steep decline.

A Trump administration analysis of the rule change did not put a number on how many more birds could die. But it said some vulnerable species could decline to the point that they would require protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Former federal officials and some scientists had said billions more birds could have died in coming decades under Trump’s new rule. Advocacy groups had lobbied the Biden transition team to block it.

“All indications are the birds need more protections and that the public strongly supports protections and loves birds,” said Steve Holmer with the American Bird Conservancy.

Industry sources and other human activities — from oil pits and wind turbines, to vehicle strikes and glass building collisions — now kill an estimated 460 million to 1.4 billion birds annually, out of an overall 7.2 billion birds in North America, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and recent studies.

Researchers say cats are the biggest single source of deaths, killing more than 2 billion birds a year.

The American Petroleum Institute, which supported the Trump rule, declined to say if it will fight to keep it.

“Our focus remains on working with the Biden administration in support of policies that support environmental protection while providing regulatory certainty,” said Amy Emmert, a senior policy adviser with the oil industry group.

Comments

81595f2dd9db45846609c618f993af1c

© Earth Protect